Yes! I am not a student of the greman language. Classes are going great.I am in no mood to post anything. Test week is taking too much of me(5 math papers in 5 days…) hope you can understand… any way i bought a new digi cam and it works charisma just like this:

I am still bemused by the fact that Shekys calls this subject MATH.

• This subject u start learning from your hmm…. say 7^th grade
• This subject which has 18769 formulas and 98762765 methods for solving 127856623547574512374 problems
• This subject which alludes to improve your analytical ability and calculative powers
• This subject which has nothing fundamental but sub-subjects like calculus and stuff which are mere inventions (although they were painted with a brush called real MATH)

First of all MATH is not a subject that provides million-1 solutions. MATH is a language.  A language in which this universe is written… U cannot hate it…. Yes! You do hate something that was taught to you and belied as MATH to you….. Those are just stuff which were written in MATH….

Any way here goes a very very famous quote:

Philosophy is written in this grand book – the universe – which stands continuously open to our gaze. But the book cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and interpret the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and its characters are triangles, circles, and other geometrical figures, without which it is humanly impossible to understand a single word of it; without these one is wandering about in a dark labyrinth.
(Galileo Galilei As quoted by Machamer in The Cambridge Companion to Galileo, pp.64f.)

I would advice people who are concerned about me not move further in this post. As I am already insane to most people who are close to me it would only impinge more fear in their minds after such a post. I have a feeling I am still more than just normal and deserve to be rated sane. (Now Krishna will you stop lamenting… my inner voice admonishes).

Any way I was thinking about this very famous question….

An angel or God comes up to you and grants you a wish. And yesterday I came up with this most stunning answer I would bet no one had ever thought of this highly original idea rather wish of mine.

It goes:

“Oh Almighty/angel! Exactly 48 hours from now my heart beat must halt and my body aborts functioning i.e. “I must die in a sophisticated way… am talking to god alright”.

And there are only two constraints:

1) There must be no pain whatsoever it must happen abruptly on 48^th hour precisely.

2) I must forget about this wish NOW.

P.S: People … please I am perfectly normal … please don’t guide me to any counseling or stuff

Mathematics is boring! How many of you would disagree to this if mathematics could prove to you that all the girls in this world are beautiful?

I hope all of you’ve heard about a fundamental proving mechanism called induction. Okay all of you have. So for those of you who don’t remember it ( I can bet you wont forget it after hearing it’s charisma of proving all girls beautiful), goto bottom of page.

The Magic:

1) I take one beautiful girl (say aishwarya rai)… or any girl who is beautiful to you (beauty is such a relative term). So ash is one girl she is beautiful It is true for n=1.

2) I assume in a set of k girls all girls are beautiful…remember it is an assumption…. Step 2 complete…

Now all I have to do I prove that in a set of k+1 girls all of them are beautiful

3) Suppose I take k+1 girl… I split them into two sets (first one has 1 to k girls and the second one had 2 to k+1 girls)…

As we all know that in any set of k girls all of them have to beautiful(assumption) we know that the first set and the second set(both of which have K girls) have to beautiful.

Therefore any set of k+1 girls are beautiful on our assumption that k girls are beautiful

Hurray! All the girls in this world are beautiful

The Induction:

1) You try to prove whatever you want to, for n=1(a single entry)

2) You assume it is true for some n=k (some no of entities)

3) And try proving it’s validity for n=k+1

which implies whatever no of entities you take, for the next number of entities the statement is true…. Which implies it is true for any number of entities.

The dreaming vampire is back!Hey this time i aint bluffing and am straight away into posting..

Yesterday went to MOOR market( a book piracy palace) and still couldnt find a book on number theory… Had to capitulate to buying an original book… Why dont they ever respect fundamental science in this country…argggggg. And went to this place called THE BOOK POINT( Either only students called richie rich buy books here or students like me take a chair in the corner and browse the blurb behind costly books) I already told you I am so crazy about number theory these days, number theory books with a white angel attire and foggy background were scripting my dreams.Now come one dont make me look fatuous.

So finally i got my hand on this springer publication’s ELEMENTS OF NUMBER THEORY(i.e my purse minus 295 bucks when i get out of this place) and i turn to leave and am left bemused with what my eyes witness….

Two ten row shelves full of books trying to give an explanation to a single 500 page story, a major movie recently, The Da Vince Code…….

Why the hell cant people look at stories like this

“A story is a story… AFTER ALL”

P.S : Questions on my dissapearance from blogville are seriously discouraged