All Girls are beautiful!!
Mathematics is boring! How many of you would disagree to this if mathematics could prove to you that all the girls in this world are beautiful?
I hope all of you’ve heard about a fundamental proving mechanism called induction. Okay all of you have. So for those of you who don’t remember it ( I can bet you wont forget it after hearing it’s charisma of proving all girls beautiful), goto bottom of page.
The Magic:
1) I take one beautiful girl (say aishwarya rai)… or any girl who is beautiful to you (beauty is such a relative term). So ash is one girl she is beautiful It is true for n=1.
2) I assume in a set of k girls all girls are beautiful…remember it is an assumption…. Step 2 complete…
Now all I have to do I prove that in a set of k+1 girls all of them are beautiful
3) Suppose I take k+1 girl… I split them into two sets (first one has 1 to k girls and the second one had 2 to k+1 girls)…
As we all know that in any set of k girls all of them have to beautiful(assumption) we know that the first set and the second set(both of which have K girls) have to beautiful.
Therefore any set of k+1 girls are beautiful on our assumption that k girls are beautiful
Hurray! All the girls in this world are beautiful
The Induction:
1) You try to prove whatever you want to, for n=1(a single entry)
2) You assume it is true for some n=k (some no of entities)
3) And try proving it’s validity for n=k+1
which implies whatever no of entities you take, for the next number of entities the statement is true…. Which implies it is true for any number of entities.
August 4, 2006 at 6:50 am
I didn’t know that you are soooooo jobless.
anyways, Post more of Aishwarya and other beautiful girls pictures.
August 4, 2006 at 9:22 am
yippieeeeee then i am beautiful too… n the way u proved all gals r beautiful i can prove that all men r crazy… ur one of em :p
August 4, 2006 at 10:16 am
vetti nayae . . . u r so jobless on earth is it . . .
thu. .
August 4, 2006 at 2:12 pm
To prove any number multiplied by zero is itself
1) 0*0 = 0
Proved for 1st case
2) Assume for any number ‘n’,
n*0 = n
3) For (n+1)
(n+1)*0 = n*0 + 1*0
= n + 1 (by assumption that any number multiplied by zero is itself)
Case 1 is true,
If n*0 = n is true, then (n+1)*0 = n+1 is also true
hence any number multiplied by zero gives itself
August 4, 2006 at 2:13 pm
ipadi thaan irukku un logic..
flawed assumption, and usage of exception as a first case. Obviously the induction’ll be flawed too
August 4, 2006 at 3:40 pm
Srik anna Vignesh,
Whatever
M00nie
U cannot misuse my theory
Curses,
Dont expose yourself da…ensineering mba aspirant software prof…..
My assumption may be flawed because it is just assumption
But your fact for 0*0 does not exist at all da… step one itself is wrong
August 4, 2006 at 4:08 pm
frankly i never found mathematics boring till 10th std.it was only after 11th,when I got introduced to some weird concepts like calculus,the letter e(whose value I still dont know),etc.that I developed an aversion towards mathematics.And now u r using the same weird logic that we studied in 11th,to prove that girls are beautiful.
August 4, 2006 at 4:09 pm
i remember reading somewhere that e represents a number between 2 and 3.Can f be used to represent a number between 3 and 4?
August 5, 2006 at 10:26 am
hello? what is 0*0? 1st std payyan kooda 0 nu solluvaan.. what do u mean it doesnt exist?
August 5, 2006 at 10:27 am
0/0 thaan doesnt exist..
August 5, 2006 at 2:35 pm
Dude
u are exposing yourself way too much… 0/0 also does not exist da….. please… and even in that case first you have to take for n=1 and then assume for n i is true… not for n=0..
Whatever the flaw lies elsewhere
August 5, 2006 at 7:58 pm
hah! funny… if girls are happy by this logic, let them be!! but truth is stranger than mathematics!
August 5, 2006 at 10:22 pm
that’s what i said.. 0/0 doesnt exist… but 0*0 DOES exist.. ur a math student, and shud know..
if u can take ur first case to be as abstract as aishwarya rai, i can take an abstract first case ‘zero’.. u took an exception, so did i..
August 6, 2006 at 6:28 am
0*0 DOES not exist……. read my comment properly…..
August 6, 2006 at 11:34 am
All girls/Women are beautiful – provided you are not gay ..not need for any Math here.!
But your Logic is as usual hi-tech.!
August 7, 2006 at 8:20 am
do me a favour.. I’m interested in knowing why 0*0 doesnt exist.. un lecturer kitta kaetutu variya?
August 11, 2006 at 10:25 pm
@shek e is not just a number between 2 and 3. its actual value is 2.71828183….
August 11, 2006 at 10:55 pm
I liked that division of (k+1) girls into two sets of k girls each,to keep ur proof in agreement with ur assumption..Cool stuff..